If you want to comment
on anything written e-mail me here abbitcat@earthlink.net
. . .And I Feel my Finger on Your
Trigger A well regulated Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
not be infringed. With the recent anniversary of the
Columbine tragedy (why do we mark these things? I feel an essay
coming on.) Talk amongst the politicos and the pundits once again
turns to gun control. I have strong opinions on this subject
(big surprise) If one reads the Bill of Rights it states "A well
regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed. " The first of that clause " A well
regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State"
is a caveat to the rest of the clause. In other words "We need
a militia so we won't take away your guns." In the times that the Bill of rights
was written the U.S. did not have an established military. In order
to defend our selves we relied on a voluntary militia that provided
their own guns. Therefore the writers of the Bill of Rights put the
gun clause in for national safety. Nowadays our borders are secured and
we have a standing military so by a strict reading of the Bill of
Rights the right to bear arms is pretty much null and void. I am not saying that the government
should take a way all our guns but anything short of that is up for
grabs. National licensing and registrations? If you need a license
to drive a car then it is only logical to have the same thing for
guns. Mandatory trigger locks? This is a no brainer we need to do
everything to protect our kids. The NRA conveniently does not mention
the "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State," part of the clause. If you believe them it
states the right to bear arms is an absolute. The problem I have with the NRA is
that their power over the government coupled with their extremist
views on guns is hindering the nation to enact common sense
legislation. I feel special interest groups are an anathema to the
representation of the "Government for the people by the people."
principle upon which we built our country. The NRA is so extreme in their views
that they don't even see how ridiculous their own speakers are. I
once saw a representative from the NRA claim he hunts quail with an
Uzi. I don't know if you know what a quail looks like but they are
mighty small birds and an uzi would just obliterate them. Another
claim the NRA makes is that guns are completely safe with the proper
training but they offer an accidental death and dismemberment
insurance to all their members, that just cracks me up. So what is the answer to this problem
I have few ideas.
enforce all the laws on the books
that already work to control guns. More laws is not what is
necessarily needed. Admit that we, as a country, are
in a sick little arms race and move to do something about it Self control The government can't, or shouldn't be
relied on, to fix everything. I think that "We the people"
should take this problem on ourselves. We should not be contributing
to the problem by buying more guns and we should work toward getting
rid of the guns that are already there. We also work towards
teaching our kids about violence and the consequences thereof. And we should communicate with our
leaders. Part of the power of the NRA is that they are a vocal
minority. We the majority should let our leader know that they don't
speak for us and let them know how we feel about guns.
Bill of Rights Amendment 2